The generic encapsulation approach has been
replaced by this more specific MPLS API.

As a consequence it is better threaded as v2 of the
generic API proposal, which may be considered again for 
later release.

This version of the RFC is discarded in patchwork

> -----Original Message-----
> Due to time risk and to enable more discussion over
> the proposed generic tunnel encapsulation [1]
> 
> This RFC only adds encapsulation for MPLS tunnel type,
> which is based on the current tunnel encapsulaiton actions.
> 
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-June/103485.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>

Reply via email to