On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 05:24 +0000, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Hello Luca > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi > > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 3:57 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; tho...@monjalon.net > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Regression tests for stable releases from > > companies > > involved in DPDK > > > > Hello all, > > > > At this morning's release meeting (minutes coming soon from John), > > we > > briefly discussed the state of the regression testing for stable > > releases and agreed we need to formalise the process. > > > > At the moment we have a firm commitment from Intel and Mellanox to > > test > > all stable branches (and if I heard correctly from NXP as well? > > Please > > Yes, I confirmed that on call on behalf of NXP. But... > > > confirm!). AT&T committed to run regressions on the 16.11 branch. > > Not until 17.05 did NXP's first driver started appearing in the DPDK > upstream releases. Somehow, I misunderstood your request for 16.11 > with 17.11 stable.
That's fine - the 17.11 branch is also getting ready for release (see relevant threads), and 18.02 will soon as well. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
