On 01-Jun-18 2:22 PM, Dariusz Stojaczyk wrote:
When trying to use it with an address that's not
managed by DPDK it would segfault due to a missing
check. The doc says this function returns either
a pointer or NULL, so let it do so.
Change-Id: Ib292f148914e67054f5d7b664077f19cba7000e4
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojac...@intel.com>
---
Generally speaking, if the commit is a bugfix, reference to the original
commit that introduces the issue should be part of the commit message.
See DPDK contribution guidelines [1] and "git fixline" [2].
[1] http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html
[2] http://dpdk.org/dev
Change-Id: is probably a leftover from Gerrit, this shouldn't be part of
the commit message.
On the substance of the patch itself:
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
