On 10-May-18 2:57 PM, Remy Horton wrote:
On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
[..]
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
[..]
+ for (idx = 0; idx < RTE_HEAP_NUM_FREELISTS; idx++) {
+ for (elem = LIST_FIRST(&heap->free_head[idx]);
+ !!elem; elem = LIST_NEXT(elem, free_list)) {
Why the double-negation?
Otherwise, see no issues.
Acked-by: Remy Horton <remy.hor...@intel.com>
Presumably to make it a boolean value, not a pointer. This was written
before my time, didn't change it :)
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
