08/05/2018 22:20, Thomas Monjalon: > 02/05/2018 23:00, Thomas Monjalon: > > 30/04/2018 14:50, Bruce Richardson: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:21:43PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > > > > When we ask to reserve virtual areas, we usually include > > > > alignment in the mapping size, and that memory ends up > > > > being wasted. Wasting a gigabyte of VA space while trying to > > > > reserve one gigabyte is pretty expensive on 32-bit, so after > > > > we're done mapping, unmap unneeded space. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Notes: > > > > v2: > > > > - Split fix for size_t overflow into separate patch > > > > - Improve readability of unmapping code > > > > - Added comment explaining why unmapping is done > > > > > > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > > > > I am not confident pushing this change post-rc1. > > Please can we have more validation tests with this patch? > > Any news about validation tests?
No news, but I've decided to push it anyway. Series applied