Hi,
12/05/2018 03:58, Andy Green:
> Signed-off-by: Andy Green <a...@warmcat.com>
Why do we need to replace rte_strlcpy fallback?
GCC 8 complains about the fallback using snprintf?
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 1998 Todd C. Miller <todd.mil...@courtesan.com>
> + *
> + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
> + * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
> + * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
> + */
> +
> +size_t
> +rte_strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t siz)
> +{
[...]
> +}
I would like to be sure there is no legal issue with this imported code.
[...]
> -static inline size_t
> -rte_strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size)
> -{
> - return snprintf(dst, size, "%s", src);
> -}
> +size_t
> +rte_strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size);
