On 05/09/2018 06:09 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 5/4/2018 1:45 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
>> Introduce new testpmd commands to load/unload RX/TX BPF-based filters.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/bpf_sup.h | 25 ++++++++
>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 149
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> app/test-pmd/meson.build | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 app/test-pmd/bpf_sup.h
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/bpf_sup.h b/app/test-pmd/bpf_sup.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..35f91a07f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/bpf_sup.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> + * Copyright(c) 2010-2017 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _BPF_SUP_H_
>> +#define _BPF_SUP_H_
>> +
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <rte_mbuf.h>
>> +#include <rte_bpf_ethdev.h>
>
> This makes testpmd depends to librte_bpf unconditionally. What do you think
> using RTE_LIBRTE_BPF macro to make it possible to disable bpf library?
>
+1
> <...>
>
>> @@ -16695,6 +16842,8 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_set_port_tm_node_parent,
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_port_tm_hierarchy_commit,
>> (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_cfg_tunnel_udp_port,
>> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_operate_bpf_ld_parse,
>> + (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_operate_bpf_unld_parse,
>
> It can be better to move testpmd_funcs.rst updates in doc patch into this
> patch,
> it helps confirming the both doc and patch.
>
