Hi Shally,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Shally Verma [mailto:shally.ve...@caviumnetworks.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 12:25 PM > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com> > Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.dohe...@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona > <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; > pathr...@caviumnetworks.com; ss...@caviumnetworks.com; > agu...@caviumnetworks.com; > dev@dpdk.org; Sunila Sahu <sunila.s...@caviumnetworks.com>; Ashish Gupta > <ashish.gu...@caviumnetworks.com> > Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] crypto/openssl: add asym crypto support > > Add asymmetric crypto operation support in openssl PMD. > Current list of supported asym xforms: > * RSA > * DSA > * Deffie-hellman > * Modular Operations [Fiona] What was your rationale for adding this into the openssl PMD vs creating a new openssl_asym PMD? Will this work ok if there's a burst of ops including asym and sym operations enqueued to the same qp?
