-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 00:17:07 +0530
> From: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>
> To: jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agra...@nxp.com,
> akhil.go...@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org
> CC: narender.vang...@intel.com, abhinandan.guj...@intel.com,
> nikhil....@intel.com, gage.e...@intel.com
> Subject: [v3,2/5] eventdev: add APIs and PMD callbacks for crypto adapter
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.c | 13 +++
> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c | 25 +++++
> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 54 ++++++++++
> lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h | 187
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> #ifndef _RTE_EVENTDEV_H_
> #define _RTE_EVENTDEV_H_
>
> +#include <rte_compat.h>
Why rte_compat.h ? Is it by mistake? I could compile without this change.
> +
> /**
> * @file
> *
> @@ -1135,6 +1137,58 @@ struct rte_event {
> int __rte_experimental
> rte_event_timer_adapter_caps_get(uint8_t dev_id, uint32_t *caps);
>
> @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@
> ((RTE_EVENT_ETH_RX_ADAPTER_CAP_OVERRIDE_FLOW_ID) | \
> (RTE_EVENT_ETH_RX_ADAPTER_CAP_MULTI_EVENTQ))
>
> +#define RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_SW_CAP \
> + RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_SESSION_PRIVATE_DATA
I thought, SW driver has support for
RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT_QP_EV_BIND.
If not, please ignore this comment.
With above changes:
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
