Per definition, rte_eth_rx_burst/rte_eth_tx_burst/rte_eth_rx_queue_count 
returns the packet number
When RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG turns on, retval of FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RTE was set to 
-ENOTSUP.
It makes confusing.
The patch always return 0 no matter no packet or there's error.

Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang at intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index 50f10d9..922a0c6 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -2530,7 +2530,7 @@ rte_eth_rx_burst(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id,
                return 0;
        }
        dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
-       FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->rx_pkt_burst, -ENOTSUP);
+       FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->rx_pkt_burst, 0);
        if (queue_id >= dev->data->nb_rx_queues) {
                PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Invalid RX queue_id=%d\n", queue_id);
                return 0;
@@ -2551,7 +2551,7 @@ rte_eth_tx_burst(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id,
        }
        dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];

-       FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->tx_pkt_burst, -ENOTSUP);
+       FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->tx_pkt_burst, 0);
        if (queue_id >= dev->data->nb_tx_queues) {
                PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Invalid TX queue_id=%d\n", queue_id);
                return 0;
@@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_count(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id)
                return 0;
        }
        dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
-       FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_count, -ENOTSUP);
+       FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_count, 0);
        return (*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_count)(dev, queue_id);
 }

-- 
1.7.4.1

Reply via email to