Fix compilation warning 'missing-field-initializers' for some GCC and clang
versions introduced in commit 0c6bc8e due to the use of C89/C90 initializers.
Using C99-style initializers

Signed-off-by: Marc Sune <marc.sune at bisdn.de>
---
 lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
index f64a0a8..ab5ca38 100644
--- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
+++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
@@ -131,7 +131,9 @@ static void kni_free_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni);
 static void kni_allocate_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni);

 static volatile int kni_fd = -1;
-static struct rte_kni_memzone_pool kni_memzone_pool = {0};
+static struct rte_kni_memzone_pool kni_memzone_pool = {
+       .initialized = 0,
+};

 static const struct rte_memzone *
 kni_memzone_reserve(const char *name, size_t len, int socket_id,
@@ -224,6 +226,7 @@ rte_kni_init(unsigned int max_kni_ifaces)
        kni_memzone_pool.initialized = 1;
        kni_memzone_pool.max_ifaces = max_kni_ifaces;
        kni_memzone_pool.free = &kni_memzone_pool.slots[0];
+       rte_spinlock_init(&kni_memzone_pool.mutex);

        /* Pre-allocate all memzones of all the slots; panic on error */
        for (i = 0; i < max_kni_ifaces; i++) {
-- 
1.7.10.4

Reply via email to