2014-10-17 18:16, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > Hi Tomas, > > Yes, you're right, we need to close on this pending item. > Thanks for bringing it up. > > I am currently working on a patch series, once I send it out > I will come back and look into to qos_sched. Is this OK with you?
Yes, thank you. > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 5:46 PM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Liu, Jijiang > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v2 20/23] librte_cfgfile: interpret config files > > Hi Cristian, > > 2014-06-04 19:08, Cristian Dumitrescu: > > This library provides a tool to interpret config files that have standard > > structure. > > > > It is used by the Packet Framework examples/ip_pipeline sample application. > > > > It originates from examples/qos_sched sample application and now it makes > > this code available as a library for other sample applications to use. > > The code duplication with qos_sched sample app to be addressed later. > > 4 months ago, you said that this duplication will be adressed later. > Neither you nor anyone at Intel submitted a patch to clean up that. > I just want to be sure that "later" doesn't mean "never" because > I'm accepting another "later" word for cleaning old filtering API. > > Maybe you just forgot it so please prove me that I'm right to accept > "later" clean-up, in general. > > Thanks
