Hi Iain It seems that all you wanted to use is about flow director or ether type filter which were all done by Jingjing Yes, after we sent out patches to dpdk.org, there a lot of code changes have been merged into its master branch. Patching directly to the latest branch might fail. I have two ideas for you.
l Wait to those being accepted, though I don?t think you will choose this way. ? l Use git to merge them together, before those being accepted. 1. Check when Jingjing sent out the patches 2. find out by ?git log? on your latest branch a commit which has the same date of Jingjing?s sending patches date 3. branch a temporary branch based on that commit 4. patch Jingjing?s code for filters. The patching could be successful 90%. 5. Then merge the master branch to the temporary branch. 6. All lastest code on master branch and patches for filters are all in the single branch. Regards, Helin From: Iain Rankin [mailto:idran...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 3:36 PM To: Zhang, Helin Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Newbie question on Fortville / i40e with regards to L2 filtering Hello Helin, Many thanks for getting back to me, very much appreciated :) I have been playing with 1.7.1 and its pretty limited with regard to filtering on i40e / Fortville. However, i do notice a number of patches in development that (i think) try to address them. Our preference is to use L2 filtering (on Fortville 40G DPDK) as we want to steer received Ethernet frames to specific lcore queues. We are willing to consider using 5tuple filtering if L2 (flex) filtering is not available. So in summary: Preference 1: L2 Flex Filtering, i.e. a method of recognising any arbitrary pattern within the first 128 bytes of a received packet (as described in testpmd documentation). Preference 2: 5tuple filtering, i.e. a method to steer packet data based on tuple data; we will have to mangle our Ethernet frame to have source and destination ip addresses. I have also made email contact with Jingjing regarding the patches. Unfortunately i get "hunk" errors when applying patches to the latest dpdk git repository. Any additionally any information you may have on Fortville filtering ability would be greatly received. Kind regards, Iain On 9 October 2014 04:12, Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang at intel.com<mailto:helin.zhang at intel.com>> wrote: Hi Iain 1.7.1 might not include newly developed/fixed filter features. See my comments in specific filters below. > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org<mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org>] On > Behalf Of Iain Rankin > Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 10:37 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Newbie question on Fortville / i40e with regards to L2 > filtering > > Hello all > > I have recently started a project that requires DPDK and the new Fortville 40G > nic. > > I am totally new to DPDK so please excuse what might as dumb questions. > > Was wondering if anyone can enlighten me to the DPDK support for a number > of filter types on Fortville / i40e. > > I have dpdk 1.7.1 compiled and a number of filter type i've tried to call up > using > testpmd report back "Operation not supported". > > I have noticed in threads that there is ongoing work to provide hardware based > filtering support for fortville / i40e. Anyone know what the current state of > that? > > Basically i am interested in L2 filtering on Fortville: > filter filter > mac filter Mac filter has already been enabled for a long time, there is a bug fix in a patches sent out recently mainly for supporting VMDq by Jing Chen > vlan filter Vlan filter has already been enabled for a long time, but it seems with bug, and now being investigated. > ether_type filter It has already been supported in the patches for "control packet filter", sent out by Jingjing Wu. > > Regards. Regards, Helin
