On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:10:55PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:24:51PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > This seems somewhat irrelevant to the patch. The default configuration is > > already the way you want it to be, shared library performance is actually > > very > > close to static performance, and yes, people can choose how they want to > > build. > > Not sure what point your trying to make here. > > Neil > > According to my reading, one of the subpatches threatened to disable the > single static libs when the grouped one is built. If you are working with > multiple DPDK apps, and one expects COMBINE_LIBS and the other does not, you > can't use both with the same copy of DPDK anymore if that subpatch gets > committed. > Ah, sorry, I misread, and thought you were advoating for making static builds the default over dynamic builds, which made no sense to me, as that was already the case.
Neil > Matthew. >
