On 11/6/2014 12:12 AM, XU Liang wrote:
> I have a multiple processes application. When start a secondary process, we
> got error message "EAL: pci_map_resource(): cannot mmap(11, 0x7ffff7fba000,
> 0x20000, 0x0): Bad file descriptor (0x7ffff7fb9000)".The secondary process
> link difference shared libraries, so the address 0x7ffff7fba000 is used.
This is a known issue, and still not be solved yet. The root cause is
exactly clear, that should be try to map an address have already used in
new process.
BTW, you should learn how to make a patch, like commit log,
signed-off-by, etc.
Thanks,
Michael
> ------------------------------------------------------------------????Burakov,
> Anatoly <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>?????2014?11?5?(???) 23:59??????
> <liang.xu at cinfotech.cn>?dev at dpdk.org <dev at dpdk.org>????RE:
> ???[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: map uio resources after hugepages when the
> base_virtaddr is configured.
>
>
>
> font-family: MS Gothic;panose-1: 2 11 6 9 7 2 5 8 2 4;font-family: Cambria
> Math;panose-1: 2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;font-family: Calibri;panose-1: 2 15 5 2 2
> 2 4 3 2 4;font-family: Tahoma;panose-1: 2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;font-family:
> \@MS Gothic;panose-1: 2 11 6 9 7 2 5 8 2 4;font-family: Microsoft
> JhengHei;panose-1: 2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;font-family: \@Microsoft
> JhengHei;panose-1: 2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal,
> div.MsoNormal {margin: 0.0cm;margin-bottom: 1.0E-4pt;font-size:
> 12.0pt;font-family: Times New Roman , serif;}
> a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority: 99;color:
> #0563c1;text-decoration: underline;}
> a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority: 99;color:
> #954f72;text-decoration: underline;}
> span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type: personal-reply;font-family: Calibri ,
> sans-serif;color: #1f497d;}
> *.MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type: export-only;font-family: Calibri ,
> sans-serif;}
> size: 612.0pt 792.0pt;margin: 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;div.WordSection1
> {page: WordSection1;}
>
>
>
>
> Hi Liang
>
> Yes it is a problem. Even if it was carefully selected by user, nothing stops
> the DPDK application from mapping something into where you?re trying to map
> your
> UIO devices. Plus, this changes the default behavior where a wrong
> base-virtaddr leads to a failure to initialize, rather than simply using a
> different address (remember that pci_map_resource fails if it cannot map the
> resource at the exact address you requested).
>
> A very crude way of finding out where hugepages end would be to walk the
> hugepage memory (walk through memsegs and note the maximum start addr +
> length of that
> memseg).
>
> Could you perhaps explain what is the problem that you?re trying to solve
> with this? I can?t think of a situation where the location of UIO maps would
> matter,
> to be honest.
>
> Thanks,
> Anatoly
>
> From: XU Liang [mailto:liang.xu at cinfotech.cn]
>
>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 3:49 PM
>
> To: Burakov, Anatoly; dev at dpdk.org
>
> Subject: ???[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: map uio resources after hugepages when
> the base_virtaddr is configured.
>
>
>
> I think the base_virtadd will be carefully selected by user when they need
> it. So maybe it's not a real problem. :>
>
>
>
>
>
> The real reason is I can't find a easy way to get the end address of
> hugepages. Can you give me some suggestions ?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ????Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
>
>
> ?????2014?11?5?(???)
> 23:10
>
>
> ?????? <liang.xu at cinfotech.cn>?dev at dpdk.org
> <dev at dpdk.org>
>
>
> ????RE:
> [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: map uio resources after hugepages when the
> base_virtaddr is configured.
>
>
>
>
> I have a slight problems with this patch.
>
>
>
> The base_virtaddr doesn't necessarily correspond to an address that
> everything gets mapped to. It's a "hint" of sorts, that may or may not be
> taken into account by mmap. Therefore we can't simply assume that if we
> requested a base-virtaddr, everything will
> get mapped at exactly that address. We also can't assume that hugepages will
> be ordered one after the other and occupy neatly all the contiguous virtual
> memory between base_virtaddr and base_virtaddr + internal_config.memory -
> there may be holes, for whatever
> reasons.
>
>
>
> Also,
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anatoly
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of lxu
>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 1:25 PM
>
> To: dev at dpdk.org
>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: map uio resources after hugepages when the
> base_virtaddr is configured.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_uio.c | 9 ++++++++-
>
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_uio.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_uio.c
>
> index 7e62266..bc7ed3a 100644
>
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_uio.c
>
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_uio.c
>
> @@ -289,6 +289,11 @@ pci_uio_map_resource(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
>
> struct rte_pci_addr *loc = &dev->addr;
>
> struct mapped_pci_resource *uio_res;
>
> struct pci_map *maps;
>
> + static void * requested_addr = NULL;
>
> + if (internal_config.base_virtaddr && NULL == requested_addr) {
>
> + requested_addr = (uint8_t *) internal_config.base_virtaddr
>
> + + internal_config.memory;
>
> + }
>
>
>
> dev->intr_handle.fd = -1;
>
> dev->intr_handle.type = RTE_INTR_HANDLE_UNKNOWN; @@ -371,10 +376,12 @@
> pci_uio_map_resource(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
>
> if (maps[j].addr != NULL)
>
> fail = 1;
>
> else {
>
> - mapaddr = pci_map_resource(NULL, fd, (off_t)offset,
>
> + mapaddr = pci_map_resource(requested_addr, fd, (off_t)offset,
>
> (size_t)maps[j].size);
>
> if (mapaddr == NULL)
>
> fail = 1;
>
> + else if (NULL != requested_addr)
>
> + requested_addr = (uint8_t *)mapaddr + maps[j].size;
>
> }
>
>
>
> if (fail) {
>
> --
>
> 1.9.1
>
>
>
>
