David,
I tested it now, and it looks like the length is proper in
dev->men_resource[0].len without this change.
Not sure what changed in my workspace as I clearly remember seeing it
wrong and hence added the extra statement in the lib.
I shall remove it in v5.
Thanks for pointing it out, David.
Regards,
-Sujith
From: David Marchand <david.march...@6wind.com>
Date: Tuesday, 25 November 2014 3:32 pm
To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" <ssujith at cisco.com>
Cc: "dev at dpdk.org" <dev at dpdk.org>, "Prasad Rao (prrao)" <prrao at
cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/6] DPDK changes for accommodating
ENIC PMD
Hello Sujith,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sujith Sankar
<ssujith at cisco.com> wrote:
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
index c776ddc..87e7862 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
@@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ pci_vfio_map_resource(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
maps[i].offset = reg.offset;
maps[i].size = reg.size;
dev->mem_resource[i].addr = bar_addr;
+ dev->mem_resource[i].len = reg.size;
}
/* if secondary process, do not set up interrupts */
I still think this part is wrong.
The length should have been populated by pci_parse_sysfs_resource().
Are you sure this length is 0 ?
Can you do give me the result of cat
/sys/bus/pci/devices/$your_device_pci_address/resource ?
Thanks.
--
David Marchand
