On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:41:53AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2014-10-09 07:29, Neil Horman: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:20:31AM +0000, Wu, Jingjing wrote: > > > Hi, Neil > > > > > > To have rte_ip.h include netinet/in.h directly is also a choice. > > > > > > But netinet/in.h contains a lot of extra stuff, and these may be useless > > > some DPDK applications, such as classification. > > > rte_ip.h provides a more simplify way for the IP protocol layer. > > > > > Not sure what the relevance there is. The definitions you want are > > standardized, theres no need for the dpdk to re-invent that wheel. Get them > > from the system include file. The fact that extra macros are available in > > netinet.h is neither relevant or true (as you can't really say for certain > > what > > an application will need). > > Neil, Matthew, > > I totally agree with your point of view. > Please, could you propose a patch to fix this issue? > Matthew, can you handle this please, I've got too much going on right now. Neil
> Thanks > -- > Thomas >
