Please Ignore this mail.
> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Jijiang > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 1:35 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/10] app/testpmd:test VxLAN Tx checksum > offload > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 1:26 AM > > To: Liu, Jijiang > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Olivier MATZ > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/10] app/testpmd:test VxLAN Tx > > checksum offload > > > > 2014-11-11 05:29, Liu, Jijiang: > > > From: Olivier MATZ > > > > On 11/10/2014 07:03 AM, Liu, Jijiang wrote: > > > > > > - if PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM is not set (legacy use case), then the > > > > > > driver use l2_len and l3_len to offload inner IP/UDP/TCP > > > > > > checksums. > > > > > > > > > > If the flag is not set, and imply that it is not VXLAN packet, > > > > > and do TX checksum offload as regular packet. > > > > > > > > > > > - if PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM is set, then the driver has to use > > > > > > inner_l{23}_len instead of l{23}_len for the same operation. > > > > > > > > > > Your understanding is not fully correct. > > > > > The l{23}_len is still used for TX checksum offload, please > > > > > refer to > > > > > i40e_txd_enable_checksum() implementation. > > > > > > > > This fields are part of public mbuf API. You cannot say to refer > > > > to i40e PMD code to understand how to use it. > > > > > > > > > > Adding PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM changes the semantic of l2_len and > > l3_len. > > > > > > To fix this, I suggest to remove the new fields > > > > > > inner_l{23}_len then add outer_l{23}_len instead. Therefore, > > > > > > the semantic of l2_len and l3_len would not change, and a > > > > > > driver would always use the same field for a specific offload. > > > > > > > > > > Oh... > > > > > > > > Does it mean you agree? > > > > > > I don't agree to change inner_l{23}_len the name. > > > The reason is that using the "inner" word means incoming packet is > > > tunneling > > packet or encapsulation packet. > > > if we add "outer"{2,3}_len, which will cause confusion when > > > processing non- > > tunneling packet. > > > > Sorry Jijiang, maybe I don't understand what you are saying, but I > > think you missed something. Let me explain the problem. > > > > For PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM, we must set l{2,3}_len. > > When PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM is set, PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM is related to inner > > IP, right? > First of all, I want to explain that what PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM meaning is, when > the flag is set, driver know that it need set TX checksum for whole packet, > not > only for inner part. > > So When PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM is set, PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM is related to inner > IP,right? > > > > > So we must set inner_l{2,3}_len. > > It means that PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM requires different fields to be set, > > depending of PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM. That's what Olivier calls a semantic > change. > > It's not acceptable for an API. > > > > PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM should always be related to l{2,3}_len. > > When PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM is set, we should add outer_l{2,3}_len. > > > > Please, correct me if I'm wrong or fix the API. > > > > Thanks > > -- > > Thomas