Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your advice.
I'll modify the patch and send it as 'patch v3' later.
On 2014/5/29 15:22, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Shannon,
>
> I feel this version is better but it's really complicated to read.
>
>> +max_processor_len=len(str(len(cores)*len(sockets)*2-1))
>> +max_core_map_len = max_processor_len*2+4
>> +if max_core_map_len < 12:
>> + max_core_map_len = 12
>
> This line is not indented as the other ones.
>
>> +max_core_id_len=len(str(max(cores)))
>> +
>> +print " ".ljust(max_core_id_len+5),
>> for s in sockets:
>> - print "\tSocket %s" % s,
>> + print "Socket %s" % str(s).ljust(max_core_map_len-7),
>> print ""
>> +print " ".ljust(max_core_id_len+5),
>
> Could you replace all these numbers by something meaningful and easier to
> understand?
> Example: 5 can be replaced by len('Core ')
>
> Other comment: please add spaces around operators (= + - *).
>
> Thanks
>
--
Shannon
