On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:47:01 +0200 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote:
> 2014-05-14 08:19, Stephen Hemminger: > > It makes no sense to inline string functions, in fact snprintf > > can't be inlined because the function supports variable number of > > arguments. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org> > > > > --- > > Resend because of lack of response > > Please do not resend patches. I prefer a ping request in the original thread. > > By the way, you didn't take into account my first comments: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-April/002028.html All the issues there are changed. includes, copyright etc. > and I'm still waiting answers to these patches: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-March/001673.html This is in the rte_sched group. patch 1 > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-March/001676.html This is more of a mess than want to get into right now. header conflicts are nuisance.
