Bruce, Stephen, It may be a duplicate, but people are likely using it. I would assume deprecate means don?t remove, but put in a comment that says please don?t use and migrate your code away from it.
Thanks, Gerald On 6/23/14, 3:18 PM, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger >> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:16 AM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Why rte_snprintf at all? >> >> Why does rte_snprintf exist? It seems like a misunderstanding or broken >> implementation of snprintf in some other C library. For standard Glibc, >> I get same result from rte_snprintf and snprintf for all inputs >>including >> boundary cases > >It can indeed probably be deprecated in next release. Any objections? > >/Bruce
