On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:20:42PM -0700, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:58:30PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:36:32AM -0700, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > > With regards to the general approach for runtime detection of software > > > functions, I wonder if something like this can be handled by the > > > packaging system? Is it possible to ship out a set of shared libs > > > compiled up for different instruction sets, and then at rpm install > > > time, symlink the appropriate library? This would push the whole issue > > > of detection of code paths outside of code, work across all our > > > libraries and ensure each user got the best performance they could get > > > form a binary? > > > Has something like this been done before? The building of all the > > > libraries could be scripted easy enough, just do multiple builds using > > > different EXTRA_CFLAGS each time, and move and rename the .so's after > > > each run. > > > > I'm not aware of a package that does anything like that. It probably > > is possible, but I imagine that it would provoke a lot of debate > > and consternation in FESCO... > > Nothing like a bit of consternation to get the adrenaline pumping, right > :-) > BTW: what is FESCO?
Fedora Engineering Steering Committee Neil and I have already felt the hot breath of FESCO on our necks regarding the Fedora DPDK package... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville at tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
