>>How about "mbufs += ret" rather than "mbufs = (struct rte_mbuf >>**)&mbufs[ret]"? Functionally it is the same, but "mbufs = (struct rte_mbuf **)&mbufs[ret]" is likely less prone to compiler warnings, so my vote is to keep it as it is and get this patch integrated asap into 1.7.
Regards, Cristian -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Shannon Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
