Hi, I am not sure if I understand the question correctly, but there was a change to the rte_mbuf structure with patch ea672a8b1655bbb44876d2550ff56f384968a43b. It got rid of the pkt member in rte_mbuf. Here is an example of how to fix it:
- eth_hdr = (struct ether_hdr *) mb->pkt.data; + eth_hdr = (struct ether_hdr *) mb->data; Another way of answering your question is that it is "data" in rte_mbuf: - struct rte_pktmbuf pkt; + /* valid for any segment */ + struct rte_mbuf *next; /**< Next segment of scattered packet. */ + void* data; /**< Start address of data in segment buffer. */ + uint16_t data_len; /**< Amount of data in segment buffer. */ On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Shankari Vaidyalingam < shankari.v2k6 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I can see that in the recent releases of DPDK the rte_mbuf structure has > undergone some changes. > Would like to know which field in the rte_mbuf data structure holds the > exact payload of the received packet in the modified structure. > > Regards > Shankari > -- -Tapio
