2014-12-08 15:26, Wodkowski, PawelX: > From: Qiu, Michael > > On 2014/12/8 19:00, Wodkowski, PawelX wrote: > > >> lib/librte_pmd_enic/enic_main.c: In function 'enic_set_rsskey': > > >> lib/librte_pmd_enic/enic_main.c:862:2: error: value computed is not used > > >> > > >> I dig out that, it was ome issue of the macros rte_memcpy() > > >> #define rte_memcpy(dst, src, n) \ > > >> ((__builtin_constant_p(n)) ? \ > > >> memcpy((dst), (src), (n)) : \ > > >> rte_memcpy_func((dst), (src), (n))) > > >> > > >> When I use only (n) instead of (__builtin_constant_p(n), it will pass( I > > >> know that it was incorrect, just a experiment). > > >> > > >> But I try to use inline function instead of macros: > > >> static inline void * rte_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n) > > >> { > > >> return __builtin_constant_p(n) ? memcpy(dst, src, n) : > > >> rte_memcpy_func(dst, src, n); > > >> } > > >> > > >> It will pass:), and works, this could be one potential workaround fix. > > >> > > >> Who knows why? The root cause is what? > > >> > > >> I've no idea about this. > > >> > > > I got the same issue while ago. I don't remember exactly everything > > > but my conclusion was that there was some bug in compiler. I think, > > > when 'n' I constant and/or small compiler is inlining memcpy and throwing > > > everything else (including returned value). In that case error is not > > > produced (I think this is a bug in compiler). In other case it is > > > computing > > > some value calling memcpy or rte_ memcpy and you should at least > > > explicitly throw it away by casting to void. I like solution with static > > > > Actually, I try to pass "n" as a Int value like 4, it still report this > > error :) > > My workaround was: > (void) rte_memcpy(...); > > But this is only a workaround.
It's not so bad. > > > inline but someone else should spoke about possible side effects. > > > > Yes, but as I know inline is better than macros. >From the GCC manual: " You may use this built-in function in either a macro or an inline function. However, if you use it in an inlined function and pass an argument of the function as the argument to the built-in, GCC never returns 1 when you call the inline function with a string constant or compound literal and does not return 1 when you pass a constant numeric value to the inline function unless you specify the -O option. " It seems the "inline fix" cannot be used. I'm going to send a patch with Pawel's workaround. -- Thomas