On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 03:19:34PM +0000, Qiu, Michael wrote: > On 2014/12/3 22:51, Richardson, Bruce wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 01:59:58PM +0000, Qiu, Michael wrote: > >> On 2014/12/3 19:43, Richardson, Bruce wrote: > >>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 07:28:19PM +0800, Michael Qiu wrote: > >>>> app/test-pmd/csumonly.c: In function ?get_psd_sum?: > >>>> build/include/rte_ip.h:161: error: dereferencing pointer ?u16? > >>>> does break strict-aliasing rules > >>>> build/include/rte_ip.h:157: note: initialized from here > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> The root cause is that, compile enable strict aliasing by default, > >>>> while in function rte_raw_cksum() try to convert 'const char *' > >>>> to 'const uint16_t *'. > >>>> > >>> What compiler version is this with? Is there any other way to fix this > >>> other than disabling the compiler warnings. Turning off strict aliasing > >>> may > >>> affect performance as it reduces the number of optimizations that the > >>> compiler > >>> can perform. > >> The compile version is: > >> > >> $ gcc -v > >> Using built-in specs. > >> Target: x86_64-redhat-linux > >> ... > >> gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4) (GCC) > >> > >> > >> The OS is centos6.5 x86_64 > >> > >> > >> Actually, another possible solution is, as gcc manual shows, use union. > >> In function rte_raw_cksum() of lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h: > >> > >> static inline uint16_t > >> rte_raw_cksum(const char *buf, size_t len){ > >> union { > >> const char *ubuf; > >> const uint16_t *uu16; > >> } convert; > >> > >> convert.ubuf = buf; > >> const uint16_t *u16 = convert.uu16; > >> ... > >> } > >> > >> This may be work, but not test yet. > >> > >> Any comments about this solution? > > what happens if you make rte_raw_cksum take a void * (or const void *) > > parameter > > instead of "const char *"? > > "size_t len" is for type char, it is the the array size(for char array > is byte numbers), if we use void *, the meaning maybe confuse I think. That shouldn't be a big issue. We can rename it to "size" instead of "len" if needed.
> But it should work with other code change. > > Thanks, > Michael > > > > /Bruce > > >