Hi Declan, Your patchset is pending for an answer to this comment.
2014-08-20 15:54, Sanford, Robert: > I have a problem with the TX-burst logic of this patch. I believe that for > packets that we *don't* enqueue to the device, we should *NOT* free them. > The API expects that the caller will free them or try again to send them. > > Here is one way to accomplish selective freeing: Move mbuf pointers of > packets successfully enqueued, to the beginning of the caller's mbuf > vector; move mbuf pointers of packets not enqueued, to the end of the > caller's mbuf list. Although possibly re-ordered, the caller will be able > to free/resend all (and only) mbufs that we failed to enqueue.
