Understood. Thanks for getting back. Regards, Sambath
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Stephen Hemminger < stephen at networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:47:10 -0800 > Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian <sambath.balasubramanian at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Stephen. I was going to do prototype something similar (not doing > > the wakeup inline but using a background thread) > > and is it a worthwhile effort to move this as a feature of the RTE ring > or > > is it best left at the application level. > > > > I prefer that RTE ring stays as simple as possible. > If you need a higher level abstraction, built it yourself >
