Here is my +1.

I checked:
[x] The download link is legal and the PGP signature are valid.
[x] The source code matches the current release version.
[x] The LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.

Mingyu Chen <morning...@163.com> 于2022年11月30日周三 17:13写道:

> +1 binding.
> I checked:
>
>
> - The download link is legal.
> - The PGP signature are valid.
> - The source code matches the current release version.
> - The LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.
> - All files carry the necessary protocol header.
> - The compiled content is not included in the source package.
> - The compilation can be executed smoothly.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> 此致!Best Regards
> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
>
> Email:
> morning...@apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2022-11-30 16:39:54, "di wu" <676366...@qq.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Please review and vote on&nbsp;Apache Doris Flink Connector 1.3.0 release.
> >At the same time, for the previously released version 1.1.1 and 1.2.1
> >
> >The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as : &nbsp;
> >1.16-1.3.0,
> >1.15-1.2.1,
> >1.14_2.12-1.1.1,
> >1.14_2.11-1.1.1
> >
> >Note:
> >
> >Available here:
> >https://github.com/apache/doris-flink-connector/tree/release-1.3.0
> >
> >Release Notes here :
> >https://github.com/apache/doris-flink-connector/issues/85
> >
> >KEYS file is available here:
> >https://downloads.apache.org/doris/KEYS
> >
> >
> >To verify and build, you can refer to following link:
> >
> >http://doris.apache.org/community/release-and-verify/release-verify.html
> >
> >The artifacts (source, signature and checksum) corresponding to this
> >release candidate can be found here:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/doris/flink-connector/1.3.0/
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/doris/flink-connector/1.2.1/
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/doris/flink-connector/1.1.1/
> >
> >
> >Staging repo link for this release:
> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedoris-1017
> >
> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> >[ ] +1 Approve the release
> >
> >[ ] +0 No opinion
> >
> >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> >Brs,
> >
> >di.wu
>


-- 
张家峰

Reply via email to