> If there is a contributor who is really not good at English technical 
> writing, then he/she can request PMC/committers from community to help to do 
> the translate & pre-review privately

That is exacly what i mean. And yes, the final document should be in English.




--

此致!Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen

Email:
chenmin...@apache.org





At 2022-03-11 14:47:18, "OpenInx" <open...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> But I would like to have a lower threshold to help the Doris community
>quickly establish a mechanism for DSIP. This is equivalent to a cold start
>process. In the meantime, PMC members will help with the translation of the
>Chinese documentation.
>
>Personally,  I will not suggest changing the normal apache way to establish
>some kinds of mechanism. The correct direction is accepting general English
>design document to apache doris board.  If there is a contributor who is
>really not good at English technical writing, then he/she can request
>PMC/committers from community to help to do the translate & pre-review
>privately. But if he/she plan to publish the design document to apache
>doris community,  it should be a general English document so that everyone
>from the community can start do the reviewing in the same baseline.
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 2:20 PM Gabriel Lee <gabrielleeb...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> This will be a useful part and I have one more suggestion.
>> We should re-organize our roadmap with DIP just like Apache
>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10176> Airflow community
>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10176>. This will help
>> developers
>> a lot to understand what we are doing and participate in some jobs.
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 14:02, 陈明雨 <morning...@163.com> wrote:
>>
>> > 1. For the existed or developing feature, this depends on the situation,
>> > such as the subsequent vectorization transformation related to Compaction
>> > or Stream load, I think it is necessary to form a DSIP.
>> > 2. How to ensure that this rule can be implemented for a long time?
>> > As reviewers, we can ask for the DSIP, for example:
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/8437
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > 此致!Best Regards
>> > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
>> >
>> > Email:
>> > chenmin...@apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 在 2022-03-11 13:53:31,"ling miao" <lingm...@apache.org> 写道:
>> > >> How to ensure that this rule can be implemented for a long time?
>> > >Maybe we can review the wiki is filled every month by hosting regular
>> > >developer conferences.
>> > >
>> > >We can put the writing DIP wiki in the development process description
>> > >document. (Just like the development process description for other
>> > projects)
>> > >For those who submit PR directly without DIP, contributors can comment
>> to
>> > >remind him to submit DIP first.
>> > >
>> > >Ling Miao
>> > >
>> > >王博 <wangbo13...@gmail.com> 于2022年3月11日周五 13:48写道:
>> > >
>> > >> +1
>> > >> I have two more questions.
>> > >> Frist:
>> > >> For many projects that have been already completed or doing, do I need
>> > to
>> > >> supplement this wiki?
>> > >> Such as Vectorization or Stability optimization of Load Process .
>> > >> Second:
>> > >> How to ensure that this rule can be implemented for a long time?
>> > >> Maybe we can review the wiki is filled every month by hosting regular
>> > >> developer conferences.
>> > >>
>> > >> 陈明雨 <morning...@163.com> 于2022年3月10日周四 13:25写道:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Hi All:
>> > >> > I would like to start using "Doris Improvement Proposals(DSIP)" to
>> > save
>> > >> > all design doc of major features of Doris.
>> > >> > The motivation of DSIP and details can be found here[1].
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Please feel free to discuss.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [1]
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DORIS/Doris+Improvement+Proposals
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> >
>> > >> > 此致!Best Regards
>> > >> > 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Email:
>> > >> > chenmin...@apache.org
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> 王博  Wang Bo
>> > >>
>> >
>>

Reply via email to