Hi all

After I created branch-0.11 from 948f497dd408b891aa0baa7964ab834d6fa4747d,
I found
some serious bug, so I suspend the work of release. After these bugs are
fixed, I recreate
branch-0.11 from ac16318c9b7753d263cbe4f9fa64ec58705e2177. And I have
tested it in
our regression environment, it works fine now.

Now I will go on this release work.

Thanks,
Zhao Chun


Zhao Chun <zh...@apache.org> 于2019年10月11日周五 下午5:30写道:

> Hi all,
>
> All serious known problems have been fixed, I have closed or postponed all
> issues belong 0.11.
> Now, I'm going to create a branch-0.11
> from 948f497dd408b891aa0baa7964ab834d6fa4747d.
>
> If you have some patch that needed to be merged to this release, please
> let me know.
> I will cherry-pick it in this branch.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhao Chun
>
> ling miao <emmymia...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月23日周一 下午4:13写道:
>
>> Hi all,
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/1840 [Bug-fix]: Remove
>> conjuncts for empty set node
>>
>> This pr has been merged in master a moment ago.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ling Miao
>>
>>
>> Zhao Chun <zh...@apache.org> 于2019年9月21日周六 上午11:47写道:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Apache Doris(incubating) 0.10.0 is released since July. some good
>> features
>> > and
>> > improvements are checked in since then. I think it's time to release
>> 0.11.0
>> > to make them visible to our users.
>> >
>> > I propose that we release 0.11.0 soon and I volunteer to be its release
>> > manager. Before I cut the release branch, I'll wait for some PR merged
>> into
>> > master
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/1845 Reduce size of
>> > HyperLogLog struct
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/1840 [Bug-fix]: Remove
>> > conjuncts for empty set node
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-doris/pull/1798 Optimize the load
>> > performance for large file
>> >
>> > Is there anything I forget that should be merged into 0.11? Please let
>> me
>> > know.
>> > Please let the community know if If you have any objections to this.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Zhao Chun
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to