Hello,

Last Saturday my release notice to annou...@apache.org 
<mailto:annou...@apache.org> was rejected.  

The 1st reason for the rejection is trivial, having not placed a link to the 
downloads in the announcement.

The 2nd reason, is fortress' download page has links to dist.apache.org 
<http://dist.apache.org/>. 

First, I thought this was wrong, because our jars are downloaded via the 
mirrors.  However, the metadata files (.asc, .md5,…) are indeed pointing to 
dist.apache.org.

Looking at the other directory subprojects, apacheds, api, studio, I noticed 
they too have the same problem.

Obviously there are new rules in place for publishing notices about project 
releases.

So, this is an FYI.  I suspect you’ll run into this on your next release.  

I’m currently looking at the download pages, trying to figure out how to fix 
this problem and interested in what others think.

Thanks,
— Shawn

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Private LIst Moderation <mod-priv...@gsuite.cloud.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Returned post for annou...@apache.org
> Date: July 21, 2018 at 7:06:58 PM CDT
> To: Shawn McKinney <smckin...@apache.org>
> Cc: announce-ow...@apache.org
> 
> Two problems with the announcement. These are explicitly called out in the 
> reject message.
> 
> 1. There is no link in the announcement to the download page. This is minor 
> and can be fixed simply by adding the link to the download page.
> 
> 2. The links on the download page to metadata files e.g.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/directory/fortress/dist/2.0.1/fortress-core-2.0.1.jar.asc
> must not refer to dist.apache.org.
> 
> Please resubmit the announcement after fixing the above.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Craig
> 
>> On Jul 21, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Shawn McKinney <smckin...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 21, 2018, at 3:10 PM, announce-ow...@apache.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> Announcements that contain a link to a web page that does not include a link
>>> to a mirror to the artifact plus links to the signature and at least one sha
>>> checksum will be rejected.
>> 
>> Confused by this.  The announcement has a link to apache fortress project 
>> page which points to downloads, that have the req’s artifacts / signatures.  
>> Please explain.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> —Shawn
> 
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 

Reply via email to