I could imagine using datafusion-table-providers-duckdb to delegate, but yes - why ?
On Sat, 7 Nov 2026 at 10:29, Marko Milenković <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Saleh, > Long story short, there is no such plans. > Having said that, datafusion and ballista do support substrait format, so > in theory you could offload duckdb queries and run them on > ballista/datafusion, but it’s far from simple switch of execution engines. > > I would be interested to hear your use case, and why don’t you simply use > datafusion and ballista directly? > > Thanks a lot > -- > Marko Milenković > > > On 7 Nov 2026, at 01:45, Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Saleh, > > > > I don't know of any plans of that nature. DuckDB has its own walled > garden > > ecosystem so I would expect they would try to add distributed processing > as > > part of collaborations with MotherDuck or other closely related projects > > > > Andrew > > > >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2026 at 8:43 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> I am new to Apache DataFusion and its associated projects. However, > >> after learning of DataFusion Ballista for distributed processing, I was > >> wondering if it can also be used with other systems, and specifically > >> with DuckDB to add distributed processing to it. If not, are there any > >> plans to support DuckDB? > >> > >> Thank you very much, > >> Saleh > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
