Thanks all for making this happen! And esp Matt for starting the conversation and getting everyone on the same page. I hope this will lead to better integration for both projects and a win for the broader ecosystem :)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 12:13 PM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote: > Update here is that both vote threads have passed unanimously; I think we > are clear to move forward with the integrations. > > Thank you everyone for your help in this process > > Andrew > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 2:59 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here's the vote thread on the iceberg dev list: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ytb9x7x8ff3b7031kcrc05nzjtmh091s > > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 11:21 AM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I have started a vote on the datafusion dev list to accept the code: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6k5lws31c61y1lx2s34pxo4lmc7334lr > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 12:45 PM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Kevin -- that would be great. > > > > > > > > If you start the iceberg vote thread, then someone else can start a > > vote > > > > thread for DataFusion to accept it. > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 12:02 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Thanks Andrew. And thank you Gabriel for porting over the code, I've > > > +1'ed > > > >> the PR (https://github.com/apache/datafusion-iceberg/pull/1) > > > >> > > > >> Happy to help start a vote on the iceberg side. > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> Kevin Liu > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 4:36 AM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > The new repository is available: > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/datafusion-iceberg > > > >> > > > > >> > Gabriel, can you take a look at making a proposed PR with the > > content > > > to > > > >> > move? > > > >> > > > > >> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 7:07 AM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> I have filed a INFR request to create the new repository: > > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-28379 > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 8:02 PM Andrew Lamb < > [email protected] > > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I will plan to run both voting threads -- I think first we > need a > > > >> repo > > > >> >> and > > > >> >> > a PR to vote on. We will work on that starting tomorrow > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 7:52 PM Neelesh Salian < > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > Sounds good to me. Feel free to start both threads. Glad to > see > > > >> this > > > >> >> > going > > > >> >> > > forward. > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 16:46 Andrew Lamb < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > I think we should do a formal vote in a separate thread -- > > for > > > >> both > > > >> >> > > > communities > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 7:11 PM Neelesh Salian < > > > >> >> > [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> Yes, to the new repo apache/datafusion-iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> Question to the folks here: Do we need a formal community > > vote > > > >> >> across > > > >> >> > > >> communities or this thread suffices? > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 03:37 Andrew Lamb < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > Thank for all the feedback so far -- unless anyone has > > > >> concerns, > > > >> >> I > > > >> >> > > will > > > >> >> > > >> > file a request a new repository for > > > apache/datafusion-iceberg > > > >> >> > tomorrow > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > Andrew > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 5:49 AM Renjie Liu < > > > >> >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > +1 for Andrew's proposal. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2026 at 1:56 AM Kevin Liu < > > > >> >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > + dev@iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > (lesson learned, emailing 2 devlist might not be the > > > best > > > >> >> idea > > > >> >> > > >> > > logistically > > > >> >> > > >> > > > haha) > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 10:48 AM Kevin Liu < > > > >> >> > [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> > wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > Thanks for all the great discussions so far. I'm > > glad > > > we > > > >> >> > found a > > > >> >> > > >> > > solution > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > that benefits the broader ecosystem. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > I'm +1 to moving to an apache-governed location, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > apache/datafusion-iceberg seems like a great > place. > > I > > > >> like > > > >> >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > process > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > Andrew proposed, happy to help with the logistics. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > Best, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > Kevin Liu > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > PS I have also removed the iceberg python binding > > that > > > >> >> exports > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > DataFusion's TableProvider, so that's 1 less thing > > we > > > >> have > > > >> >> to > > > >> >> > > >> worry > > > >> >> > > >> > > > about. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/3036 > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 6:28 AM Gabriel Musat < > > > >> >> > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> Sounds like a good direction, +1 (non binding) > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> I can help porting the commit history of the > > > >> >> > DataFusion-Iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> integration to the new repo if PMCs agree. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> On 2026/09/04 12:27:30 Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > I think this is a great idea as well -- thank > you > > > for > > > >> >> > > bringing > > > >> >> > > >> it > > > >> >> > > >> > up > > > >> >> > > >> > > > and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > for the great discussions so far. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > While at VLDB this past week, I spoke to at > least > > > >> three > > > >> >> > > people > > > >> >> > > >> > from > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > companies adding Apache Iceberg support to > their > > > >> >> products. > > > >> >> > > All > > > >> >> > > >> of > > > >> >> > > >> > > them > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> had > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > to fork iceberg-rust for one reason or another. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > I think we have a huge need to improve our > > ability > > > to > > > >> >> work > > > >> >> > > >> > together > > > >> >> > > >> > > > and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > accelerate everyone's efforts. Giving the > > > DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > access > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > more expert maintainers with bandwidth I think > > will > > > >> help > > > >> >> > > >> everyone. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > There seems to be consensus that we should move > > the > > > >> >> > > integration > > > >> >> > > >> > code > > > >> >> > > >> > > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > DataFusion governance, and that it should > remain > > in > > > >> the > > > >> >> > ASF, > > > >> >> > > >> > though > > > >> >> > > >> > > > some > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > open technical questions remain. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > If that is the case, I propose the following > > > specific > > > >> >> > > process: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > 1. Create the new gitub repository in Apache > for > > > the > > > >> >> code > > > >> >> > > (e.g. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > apache/datafusion-iceberg) > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > 2. Create a PR in the new repo with the > proposed > > > code > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > 3. Hold a formal vote on the iceberg dev list > to > > > move > > > >> >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > > integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> code > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > to DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > 4. Hold a formal vote on the DataFusion dev > list > > to > > > >> >> accept > > > >> >> > > the > > > >> >> > > >> new > > > >> >> > > >> > > > code > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > I am happy to help with the logistics (e.g. ASF > > > INFRA > > > >> >> > ticket > > > >> >> > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > create > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > new repo, votes, etc) but I am not expert > enough > > to > > > >> >> create > > > >> >> > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > proposed > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> PR. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > Please let me know your thoughts, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > Andrew > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > (PMC Chair of DataFusion) > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 9:48 PM Renjie Liu < > > > >> >> > > >> > [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > To add more background about the relationship > > > >> between > > > >> >> > comet > > > >> >> > > >> and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> datafusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > for those who are not familiar with them. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > Apache datafusion is a popular extensible > > compute > > > >> >> engine > > > >> >> > > >> written > > > >> >> > > >> > > in > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> rust. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > Apache comet is an apache spark accelerator > > > >> builton on > > > >> >> > > apache > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> datafusion, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > and also a subproject of apache datafusion. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > datafusion-iceberg is an apache datafusion > > > >> extension > > > >> >> > built > > > >> >> > > on > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> iceberg-rust, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > and comet's iceberg support is built on it. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 9:39 PM Andy Grove < > > > >> >> > > >> > [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > +1 for moving to DataFusion PMC. The > > > >> >> iceberg-datafusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> is > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > very important for Comet. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 11:42 PM Xuanwo < > > > >> >> > > [email protected] > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > TBH, I also support moving to the > > DataFusion > > > >> PMC. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > - DataFusion is the largest dependency in > > > >> >> > > >> > iceberg-datafusion. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > - The largest downstream user of > > > >> >> iceberg-datafusion > > > >> >> > is > > > >> >> > > >> > Comet, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> which > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > shares many of the same PMC members as > > > >> DataFusion. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > It feels natural to be part of the > > DataFusion > > > >> >> PMC. As > > > >> >> > > >> long > > > >> >> > > >> > as > > > >> >> > > >> > > DF > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> PMC is > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > willing to accept this project, it LGTM. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026, at 12:03, Renjie Liu > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > I don't think the testing should be a > > blocker > > > >> of > > > >> >> > moving > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > iceberg-datafusion out of iceberg-rust > repo. > > > From > > > >> >> what > > > >> >> > I > > > >> >> > > >> > learn, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> most of > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > sqllogictests are in pr of modifying > > > >> >> iceberg-datafusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > integration, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > there > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > are only few cases where we rely on > > > >> sqllogictests to > > > >> >> > > verify > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> features. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > How would that sound for the > > `iceberg-rust` > > > >> >> > community > > > >> >> > > >> to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > grant a > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > couple of Apache DataFusion PMCs committer > > > >> access to > > > >> >> > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > repository, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > limited to the `iceberg-datafusion` crate > > via a > > > >> >> > > CODEOWNERS > > > >> >> > > >> > file, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > so > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> that > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > they can help push reviews and PRs forward > > > >> >> > independently? > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > I'm not sure if this is feasible, but > > moving > > > >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> iceberg-datafusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > crate to apache datafusion project sounds a > > > more > > > >> >> > > reasonable > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> approach to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > me. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > It's still governed by Apache, and most of > > the > > > >> code > > > >> >> is > > > >> >> > > >> related > > > >> >> > > >> > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > DataFusion, so I think the DataFusion > > community > > > >> is > > > >> >> in a > > > >> >> > > >> better > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> position > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > define the vision and design for it. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 10:45 PM Gabriel > > > Musat > > > >> < > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > Hi everyone, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > Based on these two facts: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > - There's a current reviewer bandwidth > > > problem > > > >> >> that > > > >> >> > > hurts > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> development > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > velocity of the `iceberg-datafusion` crate > > > >> currently > > > >> >> > > hosted > > > >> >> > > >> > > under > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > `apache/iceberg-rust`. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > - There is value in maintaining the > > > >> >> > > `iceberg-datafusion` > > > >> >> > > >> > crate > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> inside > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > `apache/iceberg-rust` for testing, design > and > > > >> >> > governance. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > How would that sound for the > `iceberg-rust` > > > >> >> community > > > >> >> > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > grant a > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> couple > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > of Apache DataFusion PMCs committer access > to > > > the > > > >> >> > > >> repository, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> limited to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > the `iceberg-datafusion` crate via a > > CODEOWNERS > > > >> >> file, > > > >> >> > so > > > >> >> > > >> that > > > >> >> > > >> > > they > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> can > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > help > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > push reviews and PRs forward independently? > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > Based on review history, I'd propose Matt > > > >> >> Butrovich > > > >> >> > and > > > >> >> > > >> Tim > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> Saucer as > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > two good candidates, but this would be > > > completely > > > >> >> up to > > > >> >> > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > `iceberg-rust` > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > community. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > On 2026/08/26 17:56:19 Shawn Chang wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Hi all, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Summarizing the discussion so far, > > > including > > > >> a > > > >> >> few > > > >> >> > > >> points > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> raised in > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > today’s > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > community sync. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > There seems to be general agreement > that > > > the > > > >> >> > current > > > >> >> > > >> > > > DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > has a velocity/reviewer bandwidth > > problem, > > > >> and > > > >> >> > moving > > > >> >> > > >> it > > > >> >> > > >> > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > a > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > separate > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > repository could help DataFusion > > > contributors > > > >> >> > iterate > > > >> >> > > >> more > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > independently. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > At the same time, several open > questions > > > >> remain: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > - > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Whether repo separation is the right > > > >> >> solution, > > > >> >> > > >> versus > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> expanding > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > DataFusion reviewer/committer > > > >> participation > > > >> >> in > > > >> >> > > >> > > > iceberg-rust. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > - > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Where the boundary should be between > > > >> engine > > > >> >> > > specific > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Iceberg core functionality, and how > to > > > >> avoid > > > >> >> > > >> duplicated > > > >> >> > > >> > > or > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> forked > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > implementations. (how to avoid the > > case > > > >> where > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> Iceberg-datafusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > moving > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > much faster than the core and > > eventually > > > >> >> need a > > > >> >> > > >> forked > > > >> >> > > >> > > core > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> API > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > implementation) > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > - > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > How compatibility and end-to-end > > > >> correctness > > > >> >> > > testing > > > >> >> > > >> > > should > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> work > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > across > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > repositories, since iceberg-rust > still > > > >> >> relies on > > > >> >> > > >> > > DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> for > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > testing. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > - > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Where the integration should live > and > > > how > > > >> to > > > >> >> > keep > > > >> >> > > it > > > >> >> > > >> > > under > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> Apache > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > governance while making it easy for > > both > > > >> >> Iceberg > > > >> >> > > and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > contributors to maintain. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > So I think the main question is not > only > > > >> >> whether to > > > >> >> > > >> move > > > >> >> > > >> > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> code, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > but > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > how > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > to improve development velocity without > > > >> losing > > > >> >> the > > > >> >> > > >> close > > > >> >> > > >> > > > design, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > testing, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > and governance relationship between the > > > >> engine > > > >> >> > > >> integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > iceberg-rust > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > core. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Best, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > Shawn > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 4:14 AM Manu > > Zhang > > > < > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > +1 moving the DataFusion integration > > and > > > >> tests > > > >> >> > > into a > > > >> >> > > >> > > > separate > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > apache-governed repository. Can we > > bring > > > >> this > > > >> >> > > >> discussion > > > >> >> > > >> > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Community > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > Sync[1] this week? > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > 1. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YuGhUdukLP5gGiqCbk0A5_Wifqe2CZWgOd3TbhY3UQg/edit?tab=t.0 > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 3:37 PM > Renjie > > > Liu > > > >> < > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> Hi, Matt: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks for raising this. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> 1) Apache governance: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> I would +1 for putting this in an > > apache > > > >> >> repo, > > > >> >> > for > > > >> >> > > >> > > example > > > >> >> > > >> > > > a > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> sub > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > repo of > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> datafusion project. Shawn has stated > > > most > > > >> of > > > >> >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > reasons, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > so > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> I > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > don't want > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> to repeat it again. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> 2) Where do tests live/how tests > > should > > > be > > > >> >> > > >> maintained? > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> Initially I was thinking about > putting > > > >> >> > > sqllogictest > > > >> >> > > >> in > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > iceberg-rust, but > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> after second thought I'm leaning > > towards > > > >> to > > > >> >> put > > > >> >> > it > > > >> >> > > >> in > > > >> >> > > >> > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> new repo > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > for two > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> reasons: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> 1. It would be easier for developer > of > > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > datafusion-iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> to add tests > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> 2. It would make the dependency > graph > > > and > > > >> >> > version > > > >> >> > > >> > release > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> easier. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Though > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> the dependency is on crate level > > rather > > > >> than > > > >> >> > repo > > > >> >> > > >> > level, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > bi-direction > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> dependency may make version > management > > > >> weird > > > >> >> and > > > >> >> > > >> > > difficult. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> The downside of this approach is > that > > > >> it's a > > > >> >> > > little > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> unfriendly for > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> iceberg-rust developers, but I think > > > it's > > > >> >> less > > > >> >> > > >> frequent > > > >> >> > > >> > > for > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > iceberg-rust > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> developers to add sqllogictests > > compared > > > >> with > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> datafusion-iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > developers. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> 3) Dropping DataFusion dependencies > > from > > > >> >> > > >> pyiceberg-core > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> binding > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> I'm not quite familiar with this > part, > > > >> but it > > > >> >> > > sounds > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> reasonable to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > me. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> On Sat, Aug 22, 2026 at 6:50 AM > Shawn > > > >> Chang < > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > [email protected] > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Hi Matt, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Thanks for raising this! I > generally > > > >> agree > > > >> >> that > > > >> >> > > we > > > >> >> > > >> can > > > >> >> > > >> > > > move > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> datafusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> integration to a separate repo if > > that > > > >> helps > > > >> >> > more > > > >> >> > > >> > > > DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > experts to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> work on the integrations > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> On the three considerations: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> 1) Apache governance: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> I think this is my biggest concern > so > > > >> far. > > > >> >> This > > > >> >> > > >> could > > > >> >> > > >> > > not > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> only > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > affect > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> contributors, but also whether the > > > >> >> downstream > > > >> >> > > users > > > >> >> > > >> > > could > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > continue > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > to use > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> the integration. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Even if the code remains > > > Apache-licensed, > > > >> >> > > >> governance, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> release of > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> artifacts, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> and contribution policies can > matter > > > for > > > >> >> > > adoption. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> We should explore more about the > > option > > > >> to > > > >> >> keep > > > >> >> > > it > > > >> >> > > >> > under > > > >> >> > > >> > > > an > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Apache-governed > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> repository. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> 2) Where do tests live/how tests > > should > > > >> be > > > >> >> > > >> maintained? > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> I think this is closely related to > > the > > > >> >> > governance > > > >> >> > > >> > > > question. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> To > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > me, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> broader question is: *how do we > make > > it > > > >> easy > > > >> >> > for > > > >> >> > > >> > people > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> from both > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Iceberg Rust and DataFusion > > communities > > > >> to > > > >> >> > > maintain > > > >> >> > > >> > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > integration?* > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> If we move it to a non-Apache > > > >> repository, I > > > >> >> > worry > > > >> >> > > >> that > > > >> >> > > >> > > it > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> could > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> eventually > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> look somewhat like the current > > Iceberg > > > >> Java > > > >> >> <> > > > >> >> > > >> Trino > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> integration: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> integration primarily lives on the > > > Trino > > > >> >> side > > > >> >> > and > > > >> >> > > >> is > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> therefore > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > mostly > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> maintained by people who are > already > > > >> deeply > > > >> >> > > >> involved > > > >> >> > > >> > in > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> Trino. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> There is an important difference > > here, > > > >> >> though. > > > >> >> > > For > > > >> >> > > >> > > Iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> Java, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Spark is > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> arguably the primary engine > > integration > > > >> and > > > >> >> > has a > > > >> >> > > >> > large > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> Iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> contributor > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> base around it, so having the Trino > > > >> >> integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > maintained > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> more > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> independently is relatively > natural. > > In > > > >> >> Iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> Rust > > > >> >> > > >> > > > today, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> has > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> a much more central role. It is by > > far > > > >> the > > > >> >> most > > > >> >> > > >> mature > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> engine > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> in the project, is used by our > > > >> SQLLogicTest > > > >> >> > > >> > > > infrastructure, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > many > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> users > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> building on Iceberg Rust are also > > > >> building > > > >> >> on > > > >> >> > > >> > > DataFusion. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> The > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > overlap > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> between the two communities is > > > therefore > > > >> >> much > > > >> >> > > >> larger. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Because of that, I would prefer > that > > > >> >> extracting > > > >> >> > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> integration > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > does not > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> turn it into something that is > > > >> effectively > > > >> >> > owned > > > >> >> > > >> only > > > >> >> > > >> > by > > > >> >> > > >> > > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> side. Ideally, both Iceberg Rust > > > >> >> contributors > > > >> >> > and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > contributors > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> should be able to review changes, > > > >> maintain > > > >> >> > > >> > > compatibility, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > evolve the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> integration together. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> 3) Dropping DataFusion dependencies > > > from > > > >> >> > > >> > pyiceberg-core > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> binding: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > I > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > think > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> it > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> makes sense to make things simpler > > and > > > >> have > > > >> >> > left > > > >> >> > > a > > > >> >> > > >> > > comment > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> on the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > github > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> issue with more detailed thoughts: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/3036 > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Best, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Shawn > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 11:23 AM > Matt > > > >> >> > Butrovich < > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > [email protected]> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > Hello all, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > I've never tried emailing two > > > different > > > >> >> > project > > > >> >> > > >> > lists > > > >> >> > > >> > > at > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> once, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > but it > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> was > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > suggested that I do so to try to > > > track > > > >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > > conversation > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> across > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > both > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > communities. We'll see how this > > > >> threads on > > > >> >> > the > > > >> >> > > >> > mailing > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> lists. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > There has been a GitHub > Discussion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/discussions/2992#discussioncomment-18082533 > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> , > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > a GitHub Issue > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/3029, > > > >> >> > and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > it's been a long topic of > > > conversation > > > >> in > > > >> >> the > > > >> >> > > >> past > > > >> >> > > >> > two > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> weeks in > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > both > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > DataFusion and Iceberg Rust > > Community > > > >> >> Calls > > > >> >> > to > > > >> >> > > >> > discuss > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> moving > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > DataFusion integration from > Iceberg > > > >> Rust > > > >> >> to a > > > >> >> > > >> > separate > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > repository. I > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> will > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > try to summarize some of the > major > > > >> points > > > >> >> as > > > >> >> > I > > > >> >> > > >> > > > understand > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> them, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > but the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > conversations are the ground > truth > > > and > > > >> >> please > > > >> >> > > >> feel > > > >> >> > > >> > > free > > > >> >> > > >> > > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > correct me > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> here. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > The DataFusion TableProvider > > > >> integration > > > >> >> in > > > >> >> > > >> Iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > Rust > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> makes > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > a dependency for Iceberg Rust. > The > > > >> >> > integration > > > >> >> > > >> > exists > > > >> >> > > >> > > > for > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > multiple > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> reasons: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > 1) an engine to execute Iceberg > > > Rust's > > > >> >> corpus > > > >> >> > > of > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> sqllogictest > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > files > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > 2) a TableProvider integration > for > > > >> >> DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> users > > > >> >> > > >> > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> interact > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > with > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > Iceberg tables > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > Some of the motivations to break > > out > > > >> the > > > >> >> > > >> > integration: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > 1) There have been a number of > > issues > > > >> and > > > >> >> > pull > > > >> >> > > >> > > requests > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> against > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > DataFusion TableProvider in > Iceberg > > > >> Rust > > > >> >> as > > > >> >> > > users > > > >> >> > > >> > want > > > >> >> > > >> > > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> add > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > more > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > features, and they often go > stale. > > I > > > >> don't > > > >> >> > > >> believe > > > >> >> > > >> > > there > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> are > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > many > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > committers/PMC members familiar > > with > > > or > > > >> >> using > > > >> >> > > the > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> integration. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > 2) Iceberg Rust would like to > stay > > as > > > >> >> > > >> > engine-agnostic > > > >> >> > > >> > > as > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > possible. A > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > recent DataFusion Ballista > > > integration > > > >> was > > > >> >> > > >> declined > > > >> >> > > >> > > for > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> this > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > reason > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/2613 > > > >> >> > > >> . > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > 3) Other projects that rely on > both > > > >> >> Iceberg > > > >> >> > > Rust > > > >> >> > > >> and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> DataFusion > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > (e.g., > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > Comet) are blocked by Iceberg > Rust > > > >> >> upgrading > > > >> >> > > its > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> DataFusion and > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Arrow > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > dependencies before they can > > upgrade. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > Some considerations for both > > > >> communities: > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > 1) Where would this DataFusion > > > >> >> TableProvider > > > >> >> > > >> live? > > > >> >> > > >> > > Most > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > specifically, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > would it be an Apache-governed > > > >> project? As > > > >> >> > > folks > > > >> >> > > >> > like > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > @andygrove > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > point > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> out, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > this can affect whether some > > > community > > > >> >> > members > > > >> >> > > >> could > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> contribute > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > to it. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > There is a datafusion-contrib org > > for > > > >> >> > > >> > > DataFusion-related > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > projects to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> have > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > visibility but no Apache > > governance, > > > >> but > > > >> >> > there > > > >> >> > > >> may > > > >> >> > > >> > be > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> options > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > put it > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > under an Apache repository. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > 2) How would Iceberg Rust > continue > > to > > > >> run > > > >> >> > > >> > > sqllogictests > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> for > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > regression > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > testing? Does this live in a > > > different > > > >> >> > > repository > > > >> >> > > >> > that > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> depends > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > on this > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> new > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > Iceberg Rust TableProvider crate? > > > Would > > > >> >> we be > > > >> >> > > >> able > > > >> >> > > >> > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> test Pull > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> Requests on > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > Iceberg Rust with sqllogictests? > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > 3) @kevinqliu is familiar with > the > > > >> Python > > > >> >> > > >> bindings > > > >> >> > > >> > in > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> Iceberg > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Rust, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> and I > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > believe that DataFusion > dependency > > > >> might > > > >> >> be > > > >> >> > > >> removed > > > >> >> > > >> > as > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> well, > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > but > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > that > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> is > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > not the core focus of this > > > >> conversation. > > > >> >> He > > > >> >> > has > > > >> >> > > >> also > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> proposed > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > removing > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> that > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > and using the DataFusion Python > > > >> bindings > > > >> >> > > >> directly. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > I'm sure I'm forgetting things, > but > > > >> this > > > >> >> > email > > > >> >> > > is > > > >> >> > > >> > long > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> enough. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > Thanks everyone for the > discussion > > > thus > > > >> >> far, > > > >> >> > > and > > > >> >> > > >> > > looking > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > forward > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > to > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> more > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > input on this. > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > -Matt > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > Xuanwo > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > https://xuanwo.io/ > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > >> >> > [email protected] > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > > >> >> > > [email protected] > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
