dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #2465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/2465

   Bumps 
[com.unboundid:unboundid-ldapsdk](https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk) from 
7.0.2 to 7.0.3.
   <details>
   <summary>Changelog</summary>
   <p><em>Sourced from <a 
href="https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/blob/master/docs/release-notes.html";>com.unboundid:unboundid-ldapsdk's
 changelog</a>.</em></p>
   <blockquote>
   <pre><code>          &lt;div align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;
   </code></pre>
   <p>${TARGET=&quot;offline&quot;}                <!-- raw HTML omitted 
-->LDAP SDK Home Page<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
   ${TARGET=&quot;offline&quot;}                <!-- raw HTML omitted -->
   <!-- raw HTML omitted -->Product Information<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
   <!-- raw HTML omitted --></p>
   <pre><code>          &lt;h2&gt;Release Notes&lt;/h2&gt;
   <pre><code>      &amp;lt;h3&amp;gt;Version 7.0.3&amp;lt;/h3&amp;gt;
   
         &amp;lt;p&amp;gt;
           The following changes were made between the 7.0.2 and 7.0.3 releases:
         &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;
   
         &amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;
           &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;
             Fixed an issue in which the LDAP SDK did not properly handle 
certificates with a
             notBefore or notAfter timestamp that fell in the year 2049 if that 
timestamp was
             encoded with the antiquated UTCTime syntax, which only uses two 
digits to express
             the year.  The X.509 specification indicates that UTCTimestamp 
values with years
             of &amp;quot;00&amp;quot; through &amp;quot;49&amp;quot; should be 
interpreted as the years 2000 through 2049, and
             that UTCTime years of &amp;quot;50&amp;quot; through 
&amp;quot;99&amp;quot; should be interpreted as the years 1950
             through 1999, but the LDAP SDK incorrectly treated a year of 
&amp;quot;49&amp;quot; as 1949 instead
             of 2049.  All other year values were properly handled in 
accordance with the
             X.509 specification.
             &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
           &amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
   
           &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;
             Updated client-side support for the Ping Identity-proprietary 
transaction
             settings request control to add the ability to request that the 
server acquire a
             scoped lock under certain conditions.  Scoped locks may be useful 
when it is
             possible to identify operations that are more likely than others 
to result in
             lock conflicts (for example, in a multi-tenant deployment, 
operations targeting
             entries in the same tenant are probably more likely to conflict 
than operations
             targeting entries in different tenants), to limit the potential 
performance
             impact in the event of a conflict.  We also added the ability to 
override the
             conditions under which the server may attempt to acquire a 
single-writer lock
             within the associated backend, which could previously only be 
controlled through
             the server configuration, and to indicate whether the control 
should be taken
             into consideration when the operation is replicated to other 
servers in the
             topology.
             &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
           &amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;
   
           &amp;lt;li&amp;gt;
             Updated the ldifmodify tool to report an error if any of the 
sourceLDIF,
             changesLDIF, or targetLDIF arguments referred to the same file.  
They must all
             refer to different files.
             &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
   </code></pre>
   <p></code></pre></p>
   <!-- raw HTML omitted -->
   </blockquote>
   <p>... (truncated)</p>
   </details>
   <details>
   <summary>Commits</summary>
   <ul>
   <li>See full diff in <a 
href="https://github.com/pingidentity/ldapsdk/commits";>compare view</a></li>
   </ul>
   </details>
   <br />
   
   
   [![Dependabot compatibility 
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=com.unboundid:unboundid-ldapsdk&package-manager=maven&previous-version=7.0.2&new-version=7.0.3)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
   
   Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't 
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting 
`@dependabot rebase`.
   
   [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
   [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
   
   ---
   
   <details>
   <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
   <br />
   
   You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
   - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
   - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that 
have been made to it
   - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
   - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI 
passes on it
   - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and 
block automerging
   - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
   - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. 
You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
   - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of 
the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
   - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop 
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR 
or upgrade to it yourself)
   - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop 
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR 
or upgrade to it yourself)
   - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop 
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or 
upgrade to it yourself)
   
   
   </details>


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to