rmannibucau commented on code in PR #1989:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1989#discussion_r1712671129
##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/common/jaxb/JAXBUtils.java:
##########
@@ -1176,18 +1179,48 @@ private static Object createEscapeHandler(Class<?> cls,
String simpleClassName)
}
return null;
}
+
+ @SuppressWarnings({ "deprecation", "removal" })
public static JAXBContext createContext(final Set<Class<?>> classes,
final Map<String, Object> map)
throws JAXBException {
JAXBContext ctx = null;
try {
ctx = AccessController.doPrivileged(new
PrivilegedExceptionAction<JAXBContext>() {
public JAXBContext run() throws Exception {
- //This is a workaround for CXF-8675
- Class<?> factoryClass =
ClassLoaderUtils.loadClass("org.glassfish.jaxb.runtime.v2.ContextFactory",
- JAXBContextCache.class);
- Method m = factoryClass.getMethod("createContext",
Class[].class, Map.class);
- Object context = m.invoke(null, classes.toArray(new
Class<?>[0]), map);
- return (JAXBContext) context;
+ final String factoryClassName =
System.getProperty(JAXBContext.JAXB_CONTEXT_FACTORY);
Review Comment:
Why not using first JAXBContext factory methods, now it is on jakarta they
are there so reflection is not needed and all the new logic looks like the
factoryfinder of the jaxb so can be worth avoiding to duplicate for cases it
will be different (thinking to OSGi quite loud but I have other cases in mind
like some tweaks in EE servers).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
