Hi Colm,

I think it would be good to have a release soon-ish, but by and large, I don't 
think
we have hard deadline for it, please feel free to proceed as per your 
judgement. 
Thank you.
 
Best Regards,
    Andriy Redko 

> Sorry it turns out I'll need to get Santuario 3.0.4 out first. Do I
> have time to do this and WSS4J before the next CXF release?

> Colm.

> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Colm!
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:18 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> Yes, I'll call a vote today on WSS4J 3.0.3.
>>> Colm.
>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:28 PM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +1 to release Apache CXF 4.0.4
>>>> @Colm O hEigeartaigh Any chance we could have a WSS4J 3.0.3 release soon?
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Freeman
>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:15 AM Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> just for your information, the PR 
>>>>> (https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660)
>>>>> requires version of wss4f to be 3.0.3 (to contain
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-709)
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Jiri
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:53 AM Peter Palaga <ppal...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks, great to hear that, Andriy.

>>>>>> It would be great if we could get
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1660 merged in some form before the
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>> The main motivation is to be able to run CXF on FIPS-enabled systems. If
>>>>>> the customized algo suite, that the PR proposes, is questionable, I'd be
>>>>>> also fine with introducing a couple of new suites with fixed
>>>>>> non-standard names, like already done in the past for fixing CVEs. It
>>>>>> would be nice to hear other community members' thoughts.
>>>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>>> -- Peter
>>>>>> On 13/02/2024 02:35, Andriy Redko wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for reminding, I belive we are long overdue on that, @Dan,
>>>>>> @Colm
>>>>>>> may need your help please preparing the next release train (or any
>>>>>> objection folks)?
>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>      Andriy Redko
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> we are preparing Quarkus CXF to release it for Quarkus 3.8 which is
>>>>>> going to be a LTS (Long Term Support) release.
>>>>>>>> I wonder whether we could count on getting CXF 4.0.4 by February 21st
>>>>>> to be able to use it in that release?
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> -- Peter
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jiri Ondrusek <jondr...@redhat.com>
>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>> Red Hat Fuse

Reply via email to