Hey Jim,
This is interesting, I believe it is not needed, only some compiler args need
tailoring (for JDK-11) but the classes should not be copied to versions/11.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
JM> When building cxf-rt-management 3.5.1 with JDK11, some api classes are
JM> copied to the jar file. It looks like these classes are copied by the
JM> maven-bundle-plugin from java9-plus profile :
JM> *<profile> <id>java9-plus</id> <activation> <jdk>[9,)</jdk>
JM> </activation> <build> <plugins> <plugin>
JM> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
JM> <artifactId>maven-bundle-plugin</artifactId>
JM> <extensions>true</extensions> <configuration>
JM> <obrRepository>NONE</obrRepository> <instructions>
JM>
<Export-Package>org.apache.cxf.management*,org.apache.cxf.tracing*</Export-Package>
JM> </instructions>
JM> <niceManifest>true</niceManifest> </configuration>
JM> </plugin--> </plugins> </build></profile> *
JM> Why does cxf-rt-management need to copy these classes to the jar file ? Is
JM> it still needed to duplicate these classes from cxf-core ?
JM> Thanks,
JM> Jim
