rmannibucau commented on pull request #919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/919#issuecomment-1060746988


   @reta my 2cts would be to use JMS 1.1 API (JMS 2.0 API is not needed in CXF 
and does not bring anything AFAIK) and let the user provide the API he wants 
for most usages. For the distro I would prefer to add one of the AMQ 5 
relocation but artemis is fine too there. Note that there are some JMS 2 work 
for AMQ 5 (mainly importing 
https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/resource/activemq/jms2)
 so I think it would be worth pinging AMQ guys to get it faster, agree it is 
really overdue today but in terms of features and deployment I don't think 
switching the provider is user friendly....until it is not used ;) - but not 
data on that on my side.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to