Hey Andy,

I would finish up with SSE today, I was reading through the callback
discussion threads you mentioned, we may need to change a few things before
merge. The TCK formparam fixes look good to me, but I haven't dug into the
cause to be honest, Colm if you could take a look would be awesome, +1 from
me to merge. For CDI one I would appreciate to have some time to finish the
review, thanks!

Best Regards,
    Andriy Redko

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020, 12:35 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> No objections from me for including them, if Andriy is happy with them.
> Otherwise we can leave them for 3.3.6.
>
> Colm.
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 5:19 PM Andy McCright <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Andriy, Colm,
>>
>> I've three pull requests in progress that we could pull in - I'd like to
>> get some more reviews on them, but otherwise I think they are ready to
>> merge.  That said, I'm fine with waiting until the next release too.  The
>> PRs in question are:
>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/619 - Adding injection into MP Rest
>> Client's ClientHeadersFactory - this will be part of the next MP spec (not
>> yet released), thus no urgency, but still a nice feature.
>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/621 - fixes some Jakarta EE JAX-RS
>> TCK failures in the SSE bucket.
>> https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/620 - fixes some Jakarta EE JAX-RS
>> TCK failures related to FormParam processing.
>>
>> Do you want to include them in the 3.3.5?
>>
>> Thanks, Andy
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:49 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> OK thanks Freeman. As of this point I'm all done with the release.
>>> @Andriy
>>> Redko <[email protected]> please reply when you're finished with any
>>> changes
>>> and we can start the votes.
>>>
>>> Colm.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 3:00 PM ffang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > On Jan 6, 2020, at 1:16 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]
>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > >
>>> > > It would be good to get votes started on new 3.3 + 3.2 releases by
>>> the
>>> > end of this week, as we are already overdue. We already have 32 JIRAs
>>> fixed
>>> > for 3.3.5, so it's shaping up to be a pretty big release!
>>> > >
>>> > > There are 2 remaining JIRA issues targetted for 3.3.5, both assigned
>>> to
>>> > Freeman. @Freeman Fang <mailto:[email protected]> do you think
>>> you
>>> > have time to look at them? Otherwise they can be moved to 3.3.6.
>>> > Hi Colm,
>>> >
>>> > Both CXF-8173 and CXF-8183 are same issue, they are harmless in terms
>>> of
>>> > function at this stage and we can revisit in the future.
>>> > Btw, I added comment here to explain it a bit
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8173?focusedCommentId=17010739&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17010739
>>> > <
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8173?focusedCommentId=17010739&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17010739
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Best Regards
>>> > Freeman
>>> > >
>>> > > On my todo list is:
>>> > >  - Merge https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/615 <
>>> > https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/615>
>>> > >  - Update XML Schema (currently under vote)
>>> > >  - Merge a fix for the regression introduced by CXF-8088.
>>> > >
>>> > > Colm.
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to