I guess the question is: does anyone know what would be needed for the cxf-xjc-runtime artifact (and maybe others) to have the needed module name or whatever to work better on Java 9/10? I haven’t looked. If we are looking into Java9/10 things, might be good to also look at.
That said, I wouldn’t say it’s critical and thus doesn’t need to hold things up. Dan > On Apr 5, 2018, at 4:43 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sure it makes sense. Is there anything else anyone wants to fixed in the > next release? > > Colm. > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Freeman adapted cxf-xjc-plugin to work with Java 10. What about releasing >> this so that users have a working release version? >> >> Cheers >> Dennis >> > > > > -- > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > Talend Community Coder > http://coders.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
