My thinking was to move it to the provider itself since you can mix a CDI (multiple scopes)/Spring/Custom set of providers in the same app with different constraints.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> 2018-01-14 16:43 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > So you're thinking along the lines of moving some of these features into an > instance method on JAXRSServerFactoryBean so that implementors can > extend/override the behavior? > > One thing I just noticed, this problem only happens when you have a JAX-RS > Application that declares getClasses(). > > John > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > +1, basically it leads to delegate all the bean validation (not the spec) > > to the impl and skip the static utilities. This should probably be a > > general rule in CXF: never use a static method, it prevents to do a lot > of > > things (like support meta annotation for jaxrs annotations for instance > to > > cite only another feature current design locks). > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> > > > > 2018-01-14 14:36 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I noticed that CXF requires a default constructor, even when it > delegates > > > down to a CDI container to do the work. This is because all of the > > > resources/providers are passed to ResourceUtils.createApplication > which > > in > > > turn creates the default PerRequestResourceProvider for those resource > > > classes. > > > > > > When I create a dependent scoped CDI bean, I would expect I don't need > a > > > default constructor, but right now its required. I think we could > > create a > > > replacement if we passed the List<ResourceProvider> to > > > the JAXRSServerFactoryBean being created, instead of letting the > default > > > version be created first. > > > > > > John > > > > > >
