johnament commented on issue #313: [CXF-7493] Add a default ClassUnwrapper for CDI integration. URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/313#issuecomment-331001682 Sure sounds good. Feel free to merge if good. On Sep 20, 2017 6:41 PM, "Andriy Redko" <[email protected]> wrote: > *@reta* commented on this pull request. > ------------------------------ > > In integration/cdi/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/cdi/CdiClassUnwrapper.java > <https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/313#discussion_r140111136>: > > > + * > + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an > + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > + * specific language governing permissions and limitations > + * under the License. > + */ > +package org.apache.cxf.cdi; > + > +import java.util.regex.Pattern; > + > +import org.apache.cxf.common.util.ClassUnwrapper; > + > +class CdiClassUnwrapper implements ClassUnwrapper { > + private static final Pattern PROXY_PATTERN = Pattern.compile(".+\\$\\$.+Proxy"); > > @johnament <https://github.com/johnament> Sorry, was not clear, I was > referring to @sberyozkin <https://github.com/sberyozkin> suggestion for 2 > stages, let us start from CDI first, and than make a decision if it worth > going to core or not. Make sense? > > ? > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/313#discussion_r140111136>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGmh5HMBhr0c0Q4hzG8G44zuxOsC72Cks5skZSDgaJpZM4Pau6x> > . > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
With regards, Apache Git Services
