Few comments/thoughts: 1) I have no idea why the “number of jars” would have any real impact on anything. That’s a silly metric for evaluating anything. A single jar couple be a monstrous “spaghetti mess” that performs poorly whereas a collection of small individual modular jars could be better architected and perform better.
2) If you are doing REST and not soap, replace cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws with cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs. SOAP does bring in more jars as it’s a much bigger technology stack. 3) If you are deploying into a servlet container, you don’t need cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty (and thus all the Jetty dependencies). That would be for standalone only. Dan > On Mar 6, 2016, at 1:38 AM, Laxmi Narayan NIT DGP <nit.dgp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi , > I have to convert a very high end web service application which is > written in php to > > Java. Traffic will be around 0.01 million requests per second. As far as i > checked after > > adding > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId> > <artifactId>cxf-rt-frontend-jaxws</artifactId> > <version>3.1.5</version> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId> > <artifactId>cxf-rt-transports-http</artifactId> > <version>3.1.5</version> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId> > <artifactId>cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty</artifactId> > <version>3.1.5</version> > </dependency> > > I got hell amount of jars. > > I really want to keep it as light weight as possible, > > i am using spring (i cut down hibernate : i think it will slow down). > > I am fan of cxf but looks like for just developing restful web service , we > do not need > > that much like when i tried checking jersey and second reason i think cxf > is more into > > SOAP based service (btw i jave experienced that if you just return > something which > > looks like json/xml it becomes restful web service). So if cxf is using > some security > > or something to make webservice very high performance or make be fast web > > service. > > Basically , If i am gonna use a number of jar files then it should make a > sense. If I am > > going to have the same response and same level from jersey then i will use > jersey. > > > > > > *Regards,* > *Laxmi Narayan Patel* > *MCA NIT Durgapur (2011-2014)* > *Mob:- 9741292048,8345847473 * -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
