> On Aug 7, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > > used an older version but xmlschema and woodstox removal would be good (why > not recommanded if I dont use XML parsing?)
We use XML internally for various config things and setup stuff. I really have no idea if CXF would even start properly without woodstox. You’d have to try it. 95% sure it won’t work without xmlschema either. Many cxf-core classes have xmlschema params/returns as part of the method signatures. Dan > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-08-07 11:18 GMT-07:00 Daniel Kulp <[email protected]>: > >> >>> On Aug 7, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> You should be able to get rid of the wsdl stuff. We pulled all the >> wsdl stuff out of core specifically for this reason. >>> >>> XmlSchema would definitely be required. Way too much in core depends on >> that. With 3.1.x, I’m not seeing a dependency on cxf-rt-bindings-xml >> either. >> >> I think with 3.1.x, the minimal for a client would be: >> >> [INFO] org.apache.cxf.samples:jax_rs_basic:jar:3.1.3-SNAPSHOT >> [INFO] +- org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-transports-http:jar:3.1.3-SNAPSHOT:compile >> [INFO] | \- org.apache.cxf:cxf-core:jar:3.1.3-SNAPSHOT:compile >> [INFO] | +- org.codehaus.woodstox:woodstox-core-asl:jar:4.4.1:compile >> [INFO] | | \- org.codehaus.woodstox:stax2-api:jar:3.1.4:compile >> [INFO] | \- org.apache.ws.xmlschema:xmlschema-core:jar:2.2.1:compile >> [INFO] +- org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:jar:3.1.3-SNAPSHOT:compile >> [INFO] | \- javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api:jar:1.2:compile >> [INFO] +- javax.ws.rs:javax.ws.rs-api:jar:2.0.1:compile >> >> With some system settings, you could possibly remove woodstox, but that >> would be highly NOT recommended. >> >> Dan >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Aug 7, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> just a very open idea for now but I think it would be great to be able >> to >>>> use CXF JAXRS client with a bit less dependencies. >>>> >>>> Here the origin of the issue: I created several small "all in one" jar >>>> recently mainly simplifying rest calls (let take a github or jira REST >>>> client as sample if you want to see a concrete sample). Of course I used >>>> CXF for the JAXRS client - WebClient actually - and the only issue I got >>>> was the size of the jar. >>>> >>>> In my case I don't care about xml stuff (mainly use String as payloads) >> so >>>> wonder if we could get rid of wsdl, xmlschema, cxf-rt-bindings-xml etc >> as >>>> mandatory dependencies. >>>> >>>> wdyt? >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Kulp >>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog >>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >>> >> >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >> >> -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
