It sounds good, here is my +1.
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Curious what people think about the various versions for CXF 3. > > Aries: > We current support 1.x and 0.3.x via a bunch of reflection stuff. If we drop > support for 0.3.x, we can clean up some of that reflection code. However, we > then lose support for Karaf 2.2.x. > > Spring: > We current test with 3.1, but have some level of support for 2.5.x by calling > a bunch of deprecated methods instead of the newer methods. Thoughts about at > least dropping support for 2.5.x? Likely should move to 3.2 as our default, > but keep support for 3.1? > > Jetty: > We current test and ship 8.1, but have support for 7.x via a bunch of > reflection code. Since even Karaf 2.3 uses 7.x, we likely need to keep this. > :-( > > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
