On 20/12/11 19:04, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Monday, December 19, 2011 10:35:07 AM Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi KL, All,
On 16/12/11 22:34, K Fung wrote:
In 2.5.2 on later we can think of introducing an activator into the
jaxrs>
frontend so that it can discover custom Applications and providers
registered as OSGI services
Perhaps we should have a discussion on a separate thread to discuss how
you envision seeing this? In particular, I'm wondering what's the
baseline/environment you think this would be running. For example, right
now there is no activator in the CXF JAX-RS bundle but what are the
consequence of an activator in 2.5.2+ - can it be disabled? Do we rely
on
the OSGI HttpService or do we use a built-in Jetty? Can we support both?
I guess you can see that I'm pretty interested in this topic :-)
I was thinking earlier on that CXF can get a master/root activator which
will provide BundleContext, etc to individual activators which say JAXWS
and JAXRS frontends may offer; I think these activators will not act as
independent activators on its own, they will simply be able to react to
the information (BundleContext for ex) that the actual root activator
may offer.
Well, we could have the current activator grab a list out of the current
bundle (cxf-bundle) of other activators to instantiate and call. For example,
we could have a META-INF/cxf/osgi-activators.txt that is created during
bundling (shade can do it) that the OSGiExtensionLocator thing will grab and
then call the start/stop on it.
Super, this looks like a good way to start
We'd only need to look in the current
bundle. Once we split into modules, the "core" bundle would not have that and
thus wouldn't do anything, but the jaxrs bundle could properly define it's own
activator in it's manifest. This wouldn't be hard to do.
Yea;
Cheers, Sergey
Dan
For example, in case of JAX-RS, this sub-activator will probably
register ServiceTrackers and start listening for (JAX-RS) Application
interfaces and then will create an endpoint by using HttpService or
embedded Jetty, something like that
What do you think ?
Sergey
