Thanks, appreciate it!
On 2/28/2011 4:40 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Forgiven. Thanks for the apology.
Jeff
On Feb 28, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
Agreed. The CXF PMC also held that Jeff's email simply didn't reach a level
warranting public airing, given the general view--in which I've grown more in
agreement with--that *no* email warrants such airing. Any types of
questionable emails are best sent to the internal priv...@cxf.apache.org lists
anyway for proper handling.
Further, I'd have to offer a huge caveat that my advice was non-lawyerly, as
you'd probably also have to look into libel and/or invasion of privacy issues
depending on the contents of the email publicly disclosed. Such actions are
rarely a good idea.
I apologize to Jeff for any grandstanding on my part over his email, as well as
the dev list airing of it, and most especially, any false implication that
bothersome emails are common from him. I hope he'll forgive me for it.
Thanks Craig.
Glen
On 2/27/2011 9:21 AM, Craig Tataryn wrote:
I'm still waiting to see one of the "abusive" emails you speak of Glen. So far
you just kind of come off as a goof.
And enough with the "inactive" jabs, Jeff's paid his dues. You don't question a
Sensei's belt just because you weren't around when he was competing.
Craig
--
Glen Mazza
Software Engineer, Talend (http://www.talend.com)
blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza
