Hi On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:32 PM, robert <rob...@gliesian.com> wrote:
> I just located this issue: > > Minimize CXF JAX-RS bundle > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2269 > > Should it be updated to reflect your changes? > > This one is to with excluding certain packages from the composite bundle : org/apache/cxf/wsdl , org/apache/cxf/wsdl11, org/apache/cxf/ws/policy org/apache/cxf/ws/wsdl those packages contain some base interfaces/helpers used by rt/ws/* modules... But https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3021 has all the activity recorded to do with eliminating a wsdl4j dependency - I've just reopened the JIRA. The server side is fine, but the client side (HttpConduit) still needs it. So a bit more work needs to be done... Cheers, Sergey > -- Robert > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > Hi >> >> CXF JAX-RS depends on cxf-api, cxf-rt-core, cxf-common, >> cxf-rt-transports-http and the xml binding. >> >> cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty is still required in some cases - JIRA is >> open; >> >> cxf-api has some WSDL-related interfaces and thus a wsdl4j dependency is >> still needed - two JIRAs are opened - one is to eliminate this dependency >> > > > Given that it must've been the 10th time I said we'd drop the wsdl4j > dependency :-) I just went ahead and applied the local changes I had on my > laptop for a month, with a minor change. This was probably the most complex > update, others will be much simpler > > Cheers, Sergey > > > > and another one is to exclude the WSDL-related and WS-Policy related api >> from the final jar. >> >> Overall no SOAP dependencies are required at all, only some of WS-* >> related >> api is inherited - but we will make sure it's all minimized... >> >> Cheers, Sergey >> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com >> >wrote >> >> It is split. You can deploy just the jars you need. >> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:53 PM, robert <rob...@gliesian.com> wrote: >>> > This thread >>> > ( >>> >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2704700/java-rest-implementation-jersey-vs-cxf >>> ) >>> > states, "CXF is packaged up with SOAP stack support so you bring in a >>> lot of >>> > SOAP-related weight you'll never use when you build a RESTful system. >>> (There >>> > are plans to split the packaging as far as I know, though)". >>> > >>> > Are there plans to split the packaging? ... or did the user mean the >>> > opposite of what he said? >>> > >>> > Thanks! >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >
