+1
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Glen > > > John Fuhr wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:32 PM, David Bosschaert >> <david.bosscha...@gmail.com >>> +1 >>> >>> David >>> >>> On 2 December 2010 12:01, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > In the last 2 years, Colm has logged 11 issues with CXF. Every single >>> one of >>> > them came with a patch file to fix the issue: >>> > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&reporterSelect=specificuser&reporter=coheigea >>> > >>> > 11 patches is quite a lot. If they were not spread out over 2 years, >>> I >>> think >>> > he would have been noticed much sooner and been granted committership. >>> > However, it does show a long term commitment to the project and I feel >>> > becoming a committer is long overdue. >>> > >>> > He knows the WS-Sec and XML-Sec things inside and out and is a leading >>> > driver of the WSS4J and Santuario (xml-sec) libraries that we rely on. >>> > >>> > He's currently working in our sandbox and on the WSS4J trunk to update >>> WSS4J >>> > to Java5 level and clean up the WSS4J API's and such. >>> > >>> > Basically, he's been an invaluable contributor to the WS-Security stuff >>> and >>> > having him as a committer would be a big addition, IMO. >>> > >>> > >>> > Here is my +1. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Daniel Kulp >>> > dk...@apache.org >>> > http://dankulp.com/blog >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Colm-O-hEigeartaigh-for-CXF-committer-tp3289687p3292693.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
